I have spent some time on this blog bemoaning the loss of rights that Americans suffer, but I’ve said absolutly nothing about the way that the British Governement is busy turning this into a UKistan.
They are busy making a whole host of laws that are obviously being made by people who have no idea of what the real topic is, and seems to be giving into the loudest voices, or the voices that seem to be saying the right things. Their first move was to ban fox hunting. Seems like a sensible move for the liberal fox-loving people. Right up until you think about what’s going to replace hunting. In fox hunting your drive a load of dogs and horses accross the land will scare any future foxes away. No fox wants to be near that many killer dogs. Also, dogs will go for the throat of the fox. Dead. No questions. Horrible, perhaps.. but what do you replace it with?
Farmers with guns.. who can miss, and leave the fox to die slowly. You can poison them, but not only foxes eat meat, so do badgers, the same with trapping them. So yeah, win for the fox, but loose for all other animals. Nice one. You also have to remember that there was a hunting season, there is no season on trapping. So mothers are trapped, and their cubs starve. That was the first one. They listened only to the bleeding-heart city lovers who have no real idea of the country-side.
Next they thought they would put in these nice rules about Terrorism. The idea that you can hold people without charge for longer if they are suspected of Terrorism. Pardon? So the rest of the Legal system means jack? Admitedly (to my limited laymans knowledge) we havn’t gone as far as the USA, but still, it’s a slippery slope.
Then they removed the “right to protest”. Well, actually they didn’t. What they actually did was to say that you now needed a licence to protest. So, not exactly a “right” then, but more of a privilege to protest. Another right we no-longer have.
They want to re-clasify Canabis to a class B drug. AGAINST advice of their own advisers, against the advice of the people they set up to tell them these things. Why? because they don’t like it. Again, people who are not listening to what the people want. Heck, if they won’t listen to their own advisers, why would they listen to the people?
Then they slip out this one. The new sex act. The idea is sound, but as it points out this can cover Manga, and does remove the idea of consent. Now trying to ban Manga is rather like trying to close the door to stop the flood. It’s already here, and there’s been no real object to it for nearly 15 years. It’s yet another example of a Governement so far out of touch with it’s people it has no idea that you can buy manga quite happily is many main-stream outlets. The problem is that people will get the wrong idea, fail to draw the necessary lines, and ban all of them outright. Best I go hide my Manga Bible…
You also can’t have pictures of people who are 17. Despite it being legal to sleep with them, you can’t take pictures. That’s going to cause a whole host of arrests for blooming 17 year olds comming of age with their digital camera. So, you can sleep with them, just don’t take pictures, don’t even say it’s art, don’t use your girl-friends body for your A-level art project. It’s illegal folks.
That asside, you apparently can’t consent to be in the photos. IF you happen to take a picture of your wife, all trussed up, perhaps as part of legitimate sexual roleplay, your looking at a prison sentance. For doing what you enjoy, what you consent too, and in some cases what your entire relationship based on, you get a prison sentance.
Wnat to know something that’s going to compound the Issue? If this was France, none of this would be a problem.
Arn’t you glad you live in UKistan?
Black Xanthus
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.